<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who Laughs Last</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.keepapitchinin.org/2013/01/14/who-laughs-last/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.keepapitchinin.org/2013/01/14/who-laughs-last/</link>
	<description>Where our past is never very long ago</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 20:47:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lindberg</title>
		<link>http://www.keepapitchinin.org/2013/01/14/who-laughs-last/comment-page-1/#comment-382055</link>
		<dc:creator>lindberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 19:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keepapitchinin.org/?p=12484#comment-382055</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[*now*]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*now*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lindberg</title>
		<link>http://www.keepapitchinin.org/2013/01/14/who-laughs-last/comment-page-1/#comment-382052</link>
		<dc:creator>lindberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 19:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keepapitchinin.org/?p=12484#comment-382052</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If anybody ever pulled this on me, they&#039;ve have some &#039;splainin to do.

Lots of things about this story rubbed me the wrong way, too.  It makes me wonder what we&#039;ll think 50 years from not looking back at 2013...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If anybody ever pulled this on me, they&#8217;ve have some &#8216;splainin to do.</p>
<p>Lots of things about this story rubbed me the wrong way, too.  It makes me wonder what we&#8217;ll think 50 years from not looking back at 2013&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol</title>
		<link>http://www.keepapitchinin.org/2013/01/14/who-laughs-last/comment-page-1/#comment-381009</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 05:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keepapitchinin.org/?p=12484#comment-381009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was thinking of &quot;I Love Lucy&quot; too.  This would make a great sitcom script.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was thinking of &#8220;I Love Lucy&#8221; too.  This would make a great sitcom script.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ardis E. Parshall</title>
		<link>http://www.keepapitchinin.org/2013/01/14/who-laughs-last/comment-page-1/#comment-380712</link>
		<dc:creator>Ardis E. Parshall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 01:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keepapitchinin.org/?p=12484#comment-380712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the laugh, Julia!  Not that you intended to make me laugh, but your rant did!

This is another case where we see the difference a couple of generations can make. I&#039;m with you -- if anybody did anything like this to me today, I&#039;d be outraged by the manipulation and the scheming and all the rest.  

But Olive W. Burt is a favorite author, and she&#039;s a good storyteller, by the standards of the fiction in the Magazine. She writes this as if she expects her readers to find it funny, rather than offensive -- and based on some other stories that involve similar manipulation of husband or wife, I have little doubt that readers in 1951 *did* find it funny. Just think of all the &quot;I Love Lucy&quot; reruns you&#039;ve seen. Many are based on Lucy and Ricky tricking each other rather than sitting down and working out their problems like 21st century adults. Doesn&#039;t this story fit that same pattern? 

Stories like this are a genre that we don&#039;t especially enjoy any more. But I read them imagining my grandmother and her enjoyment of the story. It&#039;s one way I enter her world, and recognize that she lived in a world that was very different from mine, despite similarities in so many other ways.

But I agree with you in an objective sense -- ain&#039;t nobody better try anything like this on me!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the laugh, Julia!  Not that you intended to make me laugh, but your rant did!</p>
<p>This is another case where we see the difference a couple of generations can make. I&#8217;m with you &#8212; if anybody did anything like this to me today, I&#8217;d be outraged by the manipulation and the scheming and all the rest.  </p>
<p>But Olive W. Burt is a favorite author, and she&#8217;s a good storyteller, by the standards of the fiction in the Magazine. She writes this as if she expects her readers to find it funny, rather than offensive &#8212; and based on some other stories that involve similar manipulation of husband or wife, I have little doubt that readers in 1951 *did* find it funny. Just think of all the &#8220;I Love Lucy&#8221; reruns you&#8217;ve seen. Many are based on Lucy and Ricky tricking each other rather than sitting down and working out their problems like 21st century adults. Doesn&#8217;t this story fit that same pattern? </p>
<p>Stories like this are a genre that we don&#8217;t especially enjoy any more. But I read them imagining my grandmother and her enjoyment of the story. It&#8217;s one way I enter her world, and recognize that she lived in a world that was very different from mine, despite similarities in so many other ways.</p>
<p>But I agree with you in an objective sense &#8212; ain&#8217;t nobody better try anything like this on me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://www.keepapitchinin.org/2013/01/14/who-laughs-last/comment-page-1/#comment-380667</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 00:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keepapitchinin.org/?p=12484#comment-380667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would not have been &quot;grateful&quot; at the scheme, I would have been furious, and I would have signed the contract the next day and told him to go hire back Martha, if that is what he really wants.

Talk about treating women like infants who must be tricked into doing the &quot;right thing&quot; to spoil husband and child, and completely overlook any of her own dreams.

Sheesh!  This is one I would have burned!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would not have been &#8220;grateful&#8221; at the scheme, I would have been furious, and I would have signed the contract the next day and told him to go hire back Martha, if that is what he really wants.</p>
<p>Talk about treating women like infants who must be tricked into doing the &#8220;right thing&#8221; to spoil husband and child, and completely overlook any of her own dreams.</p>
<p>Sheesh!  This is one I would have burned!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IDIAT</title>
		<link>http://www.keepapitchinin.org/2013/01/14/who-laughs-last/comment-page-1/#comment-380059</link>
		<dc:creator>IDIAT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 16:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keepapitchinin.org/?p=12484#comment-380059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not a feminist by any stretch, but I was disappointed with those parts of the story that painted the husband as a priesthood holder (or any man, I suppose) who would be angry at his wife for not having dinner waiting for him when he got off of work.  In fact, so much so that she was willing to forego getting her daughter from mother&#039;s home just so she could get home and start dinner.  The whole attitude of expecting wife to give up plans/expecations because she married him was fairly chauvanistic, even for 1951.  And is there really a need to &quot;spoil&quot; your spouse?  Yes, sometimes.  But not all the time.  Nor your children, because they in turn grow up to be spoiled adults and spoiled spouses.  Now, no doubt they needed to work together to come up with a solution.  I&#039;ve never had to put my children in day care, and about the closest we came was when my mother in law watched our first born a couple of hours a day while I was in graduate school.  But, not everyone is living near family or in the position to trade off with friends.  Anyway, was just disappointed that (it appeared) husband wasn&#039;t more supportive or appreciative of the work wife was doing both in and out of the house.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a feminist by any stretch, but I was disappointed with those parts of the story that painted the husband as a priesthood holder (or any man, I suppose) who would be angry at his wife for not having dinner waiting for him when he got off of work.  In fact, so much so that she was willing to forego getting her daughter from mother&#8217;s home just so she could get home and start dinner.  The whole attitude of expecting wife to give up plans/expecations because she married him was fairly chauvanistic, even for 1951.  And is there really a need to &#8220;spoil&#8221; your spouse?  Yes, sometimes.  But not all the time.  Nor your children, because they in turn grow up to be spoiled adults and spoiled spouses.  Now, no doubt they needed to work together to come up with a solution.  I&#8217;ve never had to put my children in day care, and about the closest we came was when my mother in law watched our first born a couple of hours a day while I was in graduate school.  But, not everyone is living near family or in the position to trade off with friends.  Anyway, was just disappointed that (it appeared) husband wasn&#8217;t more supportive or appreciative of the work wife was doing both in and out of the house.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IDIAT</title>
		<link>http://www.keepapitchinin.org/2013/01/14/who-laughs-last/comment-page-1/#comment-379979</link>
		<dc:creator>IDIAT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 14:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keepapitchinin.org/?p=12484#comment-379979</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And I thought &quot;The Help&quot; was a Southern fried thing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I thought &#8220;The Help&#8221; was a Southern fried thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad Too</title>
		<link>http://www.keepapitchinin.org/2013/01/14/who-laughs-last/comment-page-1/#comment-379448</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad Too</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 05:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keepapitchinin.org/?p=12484#comment-379448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If she doesn&#039;t want Martha, I&#039;ll take her!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If she doesn&#8217;t want Martha, I&#8217;ll take her!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alison</title>
		<link>http://www.keepapitchinin.org/2013/01/14/who-laughs-last/comment-page-1/#comment-378479</link>
		<dc:creator>Alison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 23:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keepapitchinin.org/?p=12484#comment-378479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Slangily&quot;?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Slangily&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
