<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Political Tuesday: Declaration of Belief: Lesson 5 (1949-50)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.keepapitchinin.org/2012/09/18/political-tuesday-declaration-of-belief-lesson-5-1949-50/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.keepapitchinin.org/2012/09/18/political-tuesday-declaration-of-belief-lesson-5-1949-50/</link>
	<description>Where our past is never very long ago</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 15:11:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://www.keepapitchinin.org/2012/09/18/political-tuesday-declaration-of-belief-lesson-5-1949-50/comment-page-1/#comment-265148</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 18:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keepapitchinin.org/?p=15566#comment-265148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What an interesting and appropriate gospel lesson. 

I think no matter where your political views fall their always is (should?) be a tension between political and religious ideals. I was struck particularly by the question of Public interest and National interest. (My mind contrasted them not against each other , but instead against personal interest.) 

With a large part of the electorate, on the right and left, fighting for personal rights and liberties, I wonder how often we step back and ask ourselves whether those personal choices are in the public or national interest. 

Is a particular tax policy in the public interest, even if I personally do not benefit from it?
Does a particular military action help or hurt the national interest?
Does a public policy that annoys me help the public interest in some way?
Does this thing I am about to say or do, impact the national interests? Does the fact that I am protected in saying it mean that I should say it?

Certainly this makes me think that public and national interest may well be more important to Christ, rather than if we made a bad choice that hurt other but we officially had a right to do so, when we come to answer for our lives. We claim the personal right to apply to the Word of Wisdom and wearing modest clothing, as a right of conscience. 

There are lots of areas were we do not have direct revelations, beyond D&amp;C 134.  I think that is wise, since it gives us a framework to think about our choices, without being told exactly what to think. In a worldwide church it would be impossible to answer every question that will ever come up for every member. Since we are given a framework to think and pray, I would expect that whether we follow those thought processes will be more important than the exact answer or choice we make.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What an interesting and appropriate gospel lesson. </p>
<p>I think no matter where your political views fall their always is (should?) be a tension between political and religious ideals. I was struck particularly by the question of Public interest and National interest. (My mind contrasted them not against each other , but instead against personal interest.) </p>
<p>With a large part of the electorate, on the right and left, fighting for personal rights and liberties, I wonder how often we step back and ask ourselves whether those personal choices are in the public or national interest. </p>
<p>Is a particular tax policy in the public interest, even if I personally do not benefit from it?<br />
Does a particular military action help or hurt the national interest?<br />
Does a public policy that annoys me help the public interest in some way?<br />
Does this thing I am about to say or do, impact the national interests? Does the fact that I am protected in saying it mean that I should say it?</p>
<p>Certainly this makes me think that public and national interest may well be more important to Christ, rather than if we made a bad choice that hurt other but we officially had a right to do so, when we come to answer for our lives. We claim the personal right to apply to the Word of Wisdom and wearing modest clothing, as a right of conscience. </p>
<p>There are lots of areas were we do not have direct revelations, beyond D&amp;C 134.  I think that is wise, since it gives us a framework to think about our choices, without being told exactly what to think. In a worldwide church it would be impossible to answer every question that will ever come up for every member. Since we are given a framework to think and pray, I would expect that whether we follow those thought processes will be more important than the exact answer or choice we make.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
