<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Plural Marriage: Bite 3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.keepapitchinin.org/2012/09/11/plural-marriage-bite-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.keepapitchinin.org/2012/09/11/plural-marriage-bite-3/</link>
	<description>Where our past is never very long ago</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 04:38:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent Larsen</title>
		<link>http://www.keepapitchinin.org/2012/09/11/plural-marriage-bite-3/comment-page-1/#comment-265031</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent Larsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 11:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keepapitchinin.org/?p=19039#comment-265031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, if it is any consolation, the OED is descriptive -- recording how people DO use the language -- and not prescriptiive -- i.e., not telling us how the language SHOULD be used.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, if it is any consolation, the OED is descriptive &#8212; recording how people DO use the language &#8212; and not prescriptiive &#8212; i.e., not telling us how the language SHOULD be used.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ardis E. Parshall</title>
		<link>http://www.keepapitchinin.org/2012/09/11/plural-marriage-bite-3/comment-page-1/#comment-265024</link>
		<dc:creator>Ardis E. Parshall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 11:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keepapitchinin.org/?p=19039#comment-265024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hate to read that, Kent. Bad grammar always stings.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate to read that, Kent. Bad grammar always stings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent Larsen</title>
		<link>http://www.keepapitchinin.org/2012/09/11/plural-marriage-bite-3/comment-page-1/#comment-264933</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent Larsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 06:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keepapitchinin.org/?p=19039#comment-264933</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hate to say it Ardis, but according to the OED, &quot;Polygamist&quot; has been used as an adjective since 1855.

Their references include the following:

1886   Pall Mall Gaz. 5 Oct. 3/2   It was a greater evil to dissolve bonâ fide marriages..than to refuse baptism to polygamist husbands and their wives.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate to say it Ardis, but according to the OED, &#8220;Polygamist&#8221; has been used as an adjective since 1855.</p>
<p>Their references include the following:</p>
<p>1886   Pall Mall Gaz. 5 Oct. 3/2   It was a greater evil to dissolve bonâ fide marriages..than to refuse baptism to polygamist husbands and their wives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IDIAT</title>
		<link>http://www.keepapitchinin.org/2012/09/11/plural-marriage-bite-3/comment-page-1/#comment-263081</link>
		<dc:creator>IDIAT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keepapitchinin.org/?p=19039#comment-263081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t worry Sister Parshall -- I never regret clicking on your posts.  Your point is well taken.  It is interesting to note that in most the old talks, the brethern used the phrase &quot;plural marriage&quot; as opposed to &quot;polygamous marriage.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t worry Sister Parshall &#8212; I never regret clicking on your posts.  Your point is well taken.  It is interesting to note that in most the old talks, the brethern used the phrase &#8220;plural marriage&#8221; as opposed to &#8220;polygamous marriage.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lonn L</title>
		<link>http://www.keepapitchinin.org/2012/09/11/plural-marriage-bite-3/comment-page-1/#comment-262935</link>
		<dc:creator>Lonn L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 04:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keepapitchinin.org/?p=19039#comment-262935</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;I was the type who looked at discussions of What Is Truth only with a view toward correcting the manuscript. If you were to quote &quot;I am that I am,&quot; for example, I thought that the fundamental problem was where to put the comma, inside the quotation marks or outside.” 
― Umberto Eco, Foucault&#039;s Pendulum]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I was the type who looked at discussions of What Is Truth only with a view toward correcting the manuscript. If you were to quote &#8220;I am that I am,&#8221; for example, I thought that the fundamental problem was where to put the comma, inside the quotation marks or outside.”<br />
― Umberto Eco, Foucault&#8217;s Pendulum</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lonn L</title>
		<link>http://www.keepapitchinin.org/2012/09/11/plural-marriage-bite-3/comment-page-1/#comment-262933</link>
		<dc:creator>Lonn L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 04:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keepapitchinin.org/?p=19039#comment-262933</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think I&#039;m okay with &quot;polygamist Brigham Young.&quot; The noun adjunct describes the noun. But I agree a church can&#039;t be a polygamist, so it should be &quot;polygamous FLDS church.&quot; My brief and infallible research on dictionary.com seems to support this.

And according to Merriam-Webster, &quot;communist&quot; is both the noun and adjective form.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I&#8217;m okay with &#8220;polygamist Brigham Young.&#8221; The noun adjunct describes the noun. But I agree a church can&#8217;t be a polygamist, so it should be &#8220;polygamous FLDS church.&#8221; My brief and infallible research on dictionary.com seems to support this.</p>
<p>And according to Merriam-Webster, &#8220;communist&#8221; is both the noun and adjective form.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chocolate on my Cranium</title>
		<link>http://www.keepapitchinin.org/2012/09/11/plural-marriage-bite-3/comment-page-1/#comment-262833</link>
		<dc:creator>Chocolate on my Cranium</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 20:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keepapitchinin.org/?p=19039#comment-262833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yikes! I&#039;ve probably been using the wrong words all this time. Oh well, now I know.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yikes! I&#8217;ve probably been using the wrong words all this time. Oh well, now I know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Other Clark</title>
		<link>http://www.keepapitchinin.org/2012/09/11/plural-marriage-bite-3/comment-page-1/#comment-262822</link>
		<dc:creator>The Other Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 19:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keepapitchinin.org/?p=19039#comment-262822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i wuz robd]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i wuz robd</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy T</title>
		<link>http://www.keepapitchinin.org/2012/09/11/plural-marriage-bite-3/comment-page-1/#comment-262810</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 18:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keepapitchinin.org/?p=19039#comment-262810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Botherations. Why doesn&#039;t Wordpress have a &quot;like&quot; button? I&#039;d have used it liberally here -- a rant about the intersection of polygamy and grammar, a quote from &quot;Up,&quot; a joke about a foal, etc., etc. : )]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Botherations. Why doesn&#8217;t WordPress have a &#8220;like&#8221; button? I&#8217;d have used it liberally here &#8212; a rant about the intersection of polygamy and grammar, a quote from &#8220;Up,&#8221; a joke about a foal, etc., etc. : )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark B.</title>
		<link>http://www.keepapitchinin.org/2012/09/11/plural-marriage-bite-3/comment-page-1/#comment-262800</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 18:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keepapitchinin.org/?p=19039#comment-262800</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve heard of them stable unions.  Last one I heard about produced a foal.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve heard of them stable unions.  Last one I heard about produced a foal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
