<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Political Tuesday: Declaration of Belief: Lesson 1 (1949-50)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.keepapitchinin.org/2012/07/31/political-tuesday-declaration-of-belief-lesson-1-1949-50/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.keepapitchinin.org/2012/07/31/political-tuesday-declaration-of-belief-lesson-1-1949-50/</link>
	<description>Where our past is never very long ago</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 06:15:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ardis E. Parshall</title>
		<link>http://www.keepapitchinin.org/2012/07/31/political-tuesday-declaration-of-belief-lesson-1-1949-50/comment-page-1/#comment-247987</link>
		<dc:creator>Ardis E. Parshall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 23:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keepapitchinin.org/?p=15577#comment-247987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for engaging with this series, Grant.

As much as what is actually presented in the lesson, I&#039;m fascinated at the meta level: What would it be like to teach or participate in a lesson like this? This isn&#039;t something any of us could respond to with canned answers (&quot;pray, read your scriptures, go to church&quot;) and calls for some real thought, either to support or to constructively disagree with any given statement. I can&#039;t help wondering how that worked in 1949. I think it would be next to impossible to pull off today -- we&#039;re entirely out of the habit of doing this kind of mental work in a Church class, I hate to say.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for engaging with this series, Grant.</p>
<p>As much as what is actually presented in the lesson, I&#8217;m fascinated at the meta level: What would it be like to teach or participate in a lesson like this? This isn&#8217;t something any of us could respond to with canned answers (&#8220;pray, read your scriptures, go to church&#8221;) and calls for some real thought, either to support or to constructively disagree with any given statement. I can&#8217;t help wondering how that worked in 1949. I think it would be next to impossible to pull off today &#8212; we&#8217;re entirely out of the habit of doing this kind of mental work in a Church class, I hate to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant</title>
		<link>http://www.keepapitchinin.org/2012/07/31/political-tuesday-declaration-of-belief-lesson-1-1949-50/comment-page-1/#comment-247968</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 23:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keepapitchinin.org/?p=15577#comment-247968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1. Governments exist for the benefit of man.

(there goes Reagan&#039;s famous statement of what he thought the problem was)

8. Separation of Church and State as a principle essential to religious liberty, freedom of organization, and good society.

(Hallelujah!)

12. The right of self-defense is justifiably used when civil government breaks down; but it is the task of all citizens to maintain sound civil government and to prevent the breakdown of orderly processes.

(Wow. Take that, gun fans.)

Now, I know there are several other interpretations there of Elder Durham&#039;s just as supportive of some conservative positions. And that is exactly the point, that there are good principles to be found in various political parties and philosophies - and the Lord holds us accountable for our choices and how we make those choices. D&amp;C 134:1]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Governments exist for the benefit of man.</p>
<p>(there goes Reagan&#8217;s famous statement of what he thought the problem was)</p>
<p>8. Separation of Church and State as a principle essential to religious liberty, freedom of organization, and good society.</p>
<p>(Hallelujah!)</p>
<p>12. The right of self-defense is justifiably used when civil government breaks down; but it is the task of all citizens to maintain sound civil government and to prevent the breakdown of orderly processes.</p>
<p>(Wow. Take that, gun fans.)</p>
<p>Now, I know there are several other interpretations there of Elder Durham&#8217;s just as supportive of some conservative positions. And that is exactly the point, that there are good principles to be found in various political parties and philosophies &#8211; and the Lord holds us accountable for our choices and how we make those choices. D&amp;C 134:1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
