I suppose they wanted to end discussion of Missouri on a positive note, but the First sentance in the last panel belongs two panels back, and the panel itself with the rest of the text belongs back with the discussion of Kirtland, or else it needs a new lead in.
Comment by Eric Boysen — February 7, 2010 @ 9:17 am
I suppose they wanted to end discussion of Missouri on a positive note, but the First sentance in the last panel belongs two panels back, and the panel itself with the rest of the text belongs back with the discussion of Kirtland, or else it needs a new lead in.
Comment by Eric Boysen — February 7, 2010 @ 9:17 am