<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: They Had Questions, 1953</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.keepapitchinin.org/2009/11/06/they-had-questions-1953/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.keepapitchinin.org/2009/11/06/they-had-questions-1953/</link>
	<description>Where our past is never very long ago</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 16:11:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jks</title>
		<link>http://www.keepapitchinin.org/2009/11/06/they-had-questions-1953/comment-page-1/#comment-16857</link>
		<dc:creator>jks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 05:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keepapitchinin.org/?p=4209#comment-16857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for posting this.
I was waiting for the laser show you mentioned, but it was just a transparent picture with a light bulb behind it for the kids to look at during the junior sunday school sacrament.  Not terribly daring, but I liked the answer that they didn&#039;t want anything besides the sacrament to be something that was always done (except now white shirts).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting this.<br />
I was waiting for the laser show you mentioned, but it was just a transparent picture with a light bulb behind it for the kids to look at during the junior sunday school sacrament.  Not terribly daring, but I liked the answer that they didn&#8217;t want anything besides the sacrament to be something that was always done (except now white shirts).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rosemary</title>
		<link>http://www.keepapitchinin.org/2009/11/06/they-had-questions-1953/comment-page-1/#comment-16834</link>
		<dc:creator>Rosemary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 12:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keepapitchinin.org/?p=4209#comment-16834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As to the 300 member gospel doctrine class - remember how large some of the wards were at that time.  Some had 1000+ members.  Now the whole ward is kept not much larger than that one class!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As to the 300 member gospel doctrine class &#8211; remember how large some of the wards were at that time.  Some had 1000+ members.  Now the whole ward is kept not much larger than that one class!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ziff</title>
		<link>http://www.keepapitchinin.org/2009/11/06/they-had-questions-1953/comment-page-1/#comment-16827</link>
		<dc:creator>Ziff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 06:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keepapitchinin.org/?p=4209#comment-16827</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like Mark, I &lt;i&gt;love&lt;/i&gt; the question about 100% subscriptions. I hope the answer given is still in effect, so that my household isn&#039;t pulling the numbers down by not having multiple church magazine subscriptions. :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like Mark, I <i>love</i> the question about 100% subscriptions. I hope the answer given is still in effect, so that my household isn&#8217;t pulling the numbers down by not having multiple church magazine subscriptions. <img src='http://www.keepapitchinin.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maurine</title>
		<link>http://www.keepapitchinin.org/2009/11/06/they-had-questions-1953/comment-page-1/#comment-16824</link>
		<dc:creator>Maurine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 04:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keepapitchinin.org/?p=4209#comment-16824</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our ward clerk has to have the report on RS, Primary, YM and YW (and I assume SS) people not attending, as well as the HT and VT entered into the computer by the 10th of every month. He says the information then goes to the stake and then the church, but the only data that is used toward budgets for the wards are the &quot;statistics&quot; months of March, June, Sept, and Dec. My bishop says that our budget from the stake/church takes into consideration all of the above attendance as well as the Sacrament Meeting attendance. We have rolls kept in all of the SS classes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our ward clerk has to have the report on RS, Primary, YM and YW (and I assume SS) people not attending, as well as the HT and VT entered into the computer by the 10th of every month. He says the information then goes to the stake and then the church, but the only data that is used toward budgets for the wards are the &#8220;statistics&#8221; months of March, June, Sept, and Dec. My bishop says that our budget from the stake/church takes into consideration all of the above attendance as well as the Sacrament Meeting attendance. We have rolls kept in all of the SS classes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ardis E. Parshall</title>
		<link>http://www.keepapitchinin.org/2009/11/06/they-had-questions-1953/comment-page-1/#comment-16815</link>
		<dc:creator>Ardis E. Parshall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 21:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keepapitchinin.org/?p=4209#comment-16815</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All the old rolls are here in the church archives -- the only use I&#039;ve ever known anybody to put them to is to demonstrate that somebody lived in southern Utah during the nuclear tests and was therefore eligible for Downwinder payments. We still pass around a roll in our ward, but I have no idea whether it is used for anything at all, much less preserved. Hmmm. Something else to ponder as I lie awake at night.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All the old rolls are here in the church archives &#8212; the only use I&#8217;ve ever known anybody to put them to is to demonstrate that somebody lived in southern Utah during the nuclear tests and was therefore eligible for Downwinder payments. We still pass around a roll in our ward, but I have no idea whether it is used for anything at all, much less preserved. Hmmm. Something else to ponder as I lie awake at night.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevinf</title>
		<link>http://www.keepapitchinin.org/2009/11/06/they-had-questions-1953/comment-page-1/#comment-16811</link>
		<dc:creator>kevinf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keepapitchinin.org/?p=4209#comment-16811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Other than I know we still record sacrament meeting attendance (numbers only), which is used to calculate budget allowances.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Other than I know we still record sacrament meeting attendance (numbers only), which is used to calculate budget allowances.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevinf</title>
		<link>http://www.keepapitchinin.org/2009/11/06/they-had-questions-1953/comment-page-1/#comment-16810</link>
		<dc:creator>kevinf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:52:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keepapitchinin.org/?p=4209#comment-16810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What exactly did they do with those attendance rolls from Sunday School, etc?  I know at one time, we had to indicate how many folks on our ward rosters were not attending any meetings, but I&#039;m not sure even that happens any more.  Even home teaching and visiting teaching numbers seem to have slipped in importance.  I can&#039;t remember the last time I heard a bishop in our ward ask why the statistics weren&#039;t up to date in the MIS.  I also can&#039;t remember the last time I saw someone actually recording attendance in our ward, or any ward that I&#039;ve been in for a couple of decades.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What exactly did they do with those attendance rolls from Sunday School, etc?  I know at one time, we had to indicate how many folks on our ward rosters were not attending any meetings, but I&#8217;m not sure even that happens any more.  Even home teaching and visiting teaching numbers seem to have slipped in importance.  I can&#8217;t remember the last time I heard a bishop in our ward ask why the statistics weren&#8217;t up to date in the MIS.  I also can&#8217;t remember the last time I saw someone actually recording attendance in our ward, or any ward that I&#8217;ve been in for a couple of decades.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ardis E. Parshall</title>
		<link>http://www.keepapitchinin.org/2009/11/06/they-had-questions-1953/comment-page-1/#comment-16808</link>
		<dc:creator>Ardis E. Parshall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keepapitchinin.org/?p=4209#comment-16808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tamary, many but not all issues of the &lt;em&gt;Instructor&lt;/em&gt; answer such questions; sometimes they&#039;ll have just one, and sometimes a whole page, so I guess they answered them as the questions came in, or as they had space in the magazine.

I&#039;m not sure how abrupt the change from encouraging to discouraging questions was -- that&#039;s something I&#039;ll have to watch for. 

I remember that in the early &#039;70s both the &lt;em&gt;Ensign&lt;/em&gt; and the &lt;em&gt;New Era&lt;/em&gt; published the answers to member questions. They seemed to be genuine questions asked by members, and answered by invited experts, but it&#039;s also possible, I suppose, that they were staged questions used to provoke an article that the editor wanted to write? I dunno. Those features at least gave the appearance to the members that it was okay, even great, to write to Salt Lake like that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tamary, many but not all issues of the <em>Instructor</em> answer such questions; sometimes they&#8217;ll have just one, and sometimes a whole page, so I guess they answered them as the questions came in, or as they had space in the magazine.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure how abrupt the change from encouraging to discouraging questions was &#8212; that&#8217;s something I&#8217;ll have to watch for. </p>
<p>I remember that in the early &#8217;70s both the <em>Ensign</em> and the <em>New Era</em> published the answers to member questions. They seemed to be genuine questions asked by members, and answered by invited experts, but it&#8217;s also possible, I suppose, that they were staged questions used to provoke an article that the editor wanted to write? I dunno. Those features at least gave the appearance to the members that it was okay, even great, to write to Salt Lake like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tamary</title>
		<link>http://www.keepapitchinin.org/2009/11/06/they-had-questions-1953/comment-page-1/#comment-16806</link>
		<dc:creator>Tamary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keepapitchinin.org/?p=4209#comment-16806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How often were question-and-answer lists like this published? It&#039;s interesting to see what concerned people then. Now we&#039;re told to ask questions of our local leaders rather than writing to Church headquarters. Was that a gradual change or was it set forth as a policy at some particular time?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How often were question-and-answer lists like this published? It&#8217;s interesting to see what concerned people then. Now we&#8217;re told to ask questions of our local leaders rather than writing to Church headquarters. Was that a gradual change or was it set forth as a policy at some particular time?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ardis E. Parshall</title>
		<link>http://www.keepapitchinin.org/2009/11/06/they-had-questions-1953/comment-page-1/#comment-16805</link>
		<dc:creator>Ardis E. Parshall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keepapitchinin.org/?p=4209#comment-16805</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes! When I read that one, I thought immediately of the so-called family history classes which focus exclusively on the weighty matter of whether to enter surnames in caps or mixed case, and provide no guidance whatsoever on finding the names to record.

As for where a class that large meets (assuming that was actual attendance), remember that most wards met in single-ward buildings in 1953 so the class probably met in the chapel. The same &lt;em&gt;Instructor&lt;/em&gt; is just starting to offer suggestions, as if they were revolutionary, on how to handle Sunday School when two wards had to share a building and they could no longer both meet at 10:00. I think the only time I&#039;ve ever had the luxury of a one-ward chapel was in a small logging-camp town in northern California!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes! When I read that one, I thought immediately of the so-called family history classes which focus exclusively on the weighty matter of whether to enter surnames in caps or mixed case, and provide no guidance whatsoever on finding the names to record.</p>
<p>As for where a class that large meets (assuming that was actual attendance), remember that most wards met in single-ward buildings in 1953 so the class probably met in the chapel. The same <em>Instructor</em> is just starting to offer suggestions, as if they were revolutionary, on how to handle Sunday School when two wards had to share a building and they could no longer both meet at 10:00. I think the only time I&#8217;ve ever had the luxury of a one-ward chapel was in a small logging-camp town in northern California!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
