<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Territorial Library: Periodicals and Newspapers; Catalogues</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.keepapitchinin.org/2008/07/05/territorial-library-periodicals-and-newspapers-catalogues/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.keepapitchinin.org/2008/07/05/territorial-library-periodicals-and-newspapers-catalogues/</link>
	<description>Where our past is never very long ago</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 15:11:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ardis E. Parshall</title>
		<link>http://www.keepapitchinin.org/2008/07/05/territorial-library-periodicals-and-newspapers-catalogues/comment-page-1/#comment-1027</link>
		<dc:creator>Ardis E. Parshall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 17:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keepapitchinin.org/?p=79#comment-1027</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree, Researcher -- outside of a single volume of Shakespeare and the Don Quixote, there really isn&#039;t anything here that was of lasting value. Perhaps that was partly (not much, but partly) a function of 90% of the books having been published in 1850 or 1851 -- how many of the books published in any one or two years of the recent past will be of much interest to readers 150 years from now?

Yet there is such balance. He tried to cover every practical subject (the less practical ones -- say, the books on navigation) tended to be gifts. If we were to build a similar-size library today, we wouldn&#039;t be doing too bad to replace the outdated titles with modern titles on exactly the same subjects (supplemented by books on entire fields that didn&#039;t exist then).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, Researcher &#8212; outside of a single volume of Shakespeare and the Don Quixote, there really isn&#8217;t anything here that was of lasting value. Perhaps that was partly (not much, but partly) a function of 90% of the books having been published in 1850 or 1851 &#8212; how many of the books published in any one or two years of the recent past will be of much interest to readers 150 years from now?</p>
<p>Yet there is such balance. He tried to cover every practical subject (the less practical ones &#8212; say, the books on navigation) tended to be gifts. If we were to build a similar-size library today, we wouldn&#8217;t be doing too bad to replace the outdated titles with modern titles on exactly the same subjects (supplemented by books on entire fields that didn&#8217;t exist then).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Researcher</title>
		<link>http://www.keepapitchinin.org/2008/07/05/territorial-library-periodicals-and-newspapers-catalogues/comment-page-1/#comment-1025</link>
		<dc:creator>Researcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 16:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keepapitchinin.org/?p=79#comment-1025</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I worked through the Ethics section, the Committee on Ways and Means (my husband) asked if I&#039;d seen any books that would be worth purchasing.

After some deep thought (of about two seconds duration) I had to answer, &quot;No.&quot;

Many of the books are dated. A book that went through 150 editions such as Johann Georg Zimmermann&#039;s &lt;em&gt;Solitude&lt;/em&gt; would be very hard for a modern reader to get through.

From what I&#039;ve seen and read, most of the books would be primarily of interest to a historian or rare book collector. Or an author trying to get a flavor of the times.

Despite that, the breadth of the collection continues to fascinate me. It was a very comprehensive library for the time and Bernhisel did an amazing job with the resources he had available to him.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I worked through the Ethics section, the Committee on Ways and Means (my husband) asked if I&#8217;d seen any books that would be worth purchasing.</p>
<p>After some deep thought (of about two seconds duration) I had to answer, &#8220;No.&#8221;</p>
<p>Many of the books are dated. A book that went through 150 editions such as Johann Georg Zimmermann&#8217;s <em>Solitude</em> would be very hard for a modern reader to get through.</p>
<p>From what I&#8217;ve seen and read, most of the books would be primarily of interest to a historian or rare book collector. Or an author trying to get a flavor of the times.</p>
<p>Despite that, the breadth of the collection continues to fascinate me. It was a very comprehensive library for the time and Bernhisel did an amazing job with the resources he had available to him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ardis E. Parshall</title>
		<link>http://www.keepapitchinin.org/2008/07/05/territorial-library-periodicals-and-newspapers-catalogues/comment-page-1/#comment-1016</link>
		<dc:creator>Ardis E. Parshall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 22:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keepapitchinin.org/?p=79#comment-1016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tur-whobian? I had to look that one up -- learned a new one, thanks. I&#039;ve been using Chicago Manual of Style, although I need to make a sweep through the catalog when we&#039;re done to regularize the punctuation.

Author Last, First. Title. Edition. Volumes. (Place: Publisher, date). Presented by ... Copies.

Of course, very few entries have that much. The original catalog is very sketchy in its citations, including whether an author is listed first as author, or in a possessive opening to the title (&quot;Smith, John. Roadbuilding.&quot; - vs - &quot;Smith&#039;s Roadbuilding.&quot;) I&#039;ve been leaving that as given in the 1852 catalog, unless I can find a GoogleBooks title page that lets me correct the entry.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tur-whobian? I had to look that one up &#8212; learned a new one, thanks. I&#8217;ve been using Chicago Manual of Style, although I need to make a sweep through the catalog when we&#8217;re done to regularize the punctuation.</p>
<p>Author Last, First. Title. Edition. Volumes. (Place: Publisher, date). Presented by &#8230; Copies.</p>
<p>Of course, very few entries have that much. The original catalog is very sketchy in its citations, including whether an author is listed first as author, or in a possessive opening to the title (&#8220;Smith, John. Roadbuilding.&#8221; &#8211; vs &#8211; &#8220;Smith&#8217;s Roadbuilding.&#8221;) I&#8217;ve been leaving that as given in the 1852 catalog, unless I can find a GoogleBooks title page that lets me correct the entry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Researcher</title>
		<link>http://www.keepapitchinin.org/2008/07/05/territorial-library-periodicals-and-newspapers-catalogues/comment-page-1/#comment-1014</link>
		<dc:creator>Researcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 22:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keepapitchinin.org/?p=79#comment-1014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ardis, if you have a preference, which citation style do you prefer? Turabian? MLA? Something else?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ardis, if you have a preference, which citation style do you prefer? Turabian? MLA? Something else?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Stapley</title>
		<link>http://www.keepapitchinin.org/2008/07/05/territorial-library-periodicals-and-newspapers-catalogues/comment-page-1/#comment-1011</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Stapley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 21:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keepapitchinin.org/?p=79#comment-1011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been offline a lot lately, so missed the earlier installments.  This is wonderful work!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been offline a lot lately, so missed the earlier installments.  This is wonderful work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
